From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-exp-bibtex missing in git? Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:06:29 +0100 Message-ID: <871ubq50gq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130303070635.GA12112@panahar> <87fw0cg42y.fsf@allisson.co> <87vc98be83.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehfwwgdd.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppzg2r05.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87ppzgusem.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppzcfy2e.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87lia0s7wi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <876213lqfk.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqtjo6h6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87boavcpzc.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw075ivl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppzbcdnt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDixP-0002zs-3u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:06:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDixN-0000EE-Vf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:06:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:55009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDixN-0000E8-PT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:06:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fg15so1735443wgb.1 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:06:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ppzbcdnt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:39:34 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Achim, Achim Gratz writes: > Bastien writes: >> I like Aaron's idea (maybe others proposed this too) of having >> parameters in links: > > We've had some of this discussion about two years ago IIRC, so here I am > again: there's an internet standard for this kind of thing, it's called > URN/URI. I'm all for following established standards, but I'm not sure what is the concrete proposal here. Do you mean using something like this [[file:my.bib&key=key;prenote=note1;postnote=note2][key]] for the file: protocol, where key, prenote and postnote would be parsed as keywords by the export function? Obvisouly we cannot use this for the http protocol, local parameters would conflict with the URL ones -- but maybe I didn't understand. Thanks for further enlightenment! -- Bastien