From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: \newpage in HTML export Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:39:59 +0100 Message-ID: <871u0pcbw0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <8738moubd4.fsf_-_@ericabrahamsen.net> <8738mo68fi.fsf@gmail.com> <3389069.jUrlGMUlNA@descartes> <87a9gu6t92.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3fym54f.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87li0dvr4d.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87wqixhu66.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz6r4-0003jU-SU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:40:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz6qx-0008JT-Ik for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:40:10 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:35126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz6qx-0008HR-DX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:40:03 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w61so13809582wes.14 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 07:40:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wqixhu66.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:49:53 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Andreas Leha , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> So in short: If page breaks are not in org directly many people will >> end up with inferior and/or less portable org files. > > For the record, after thinking about it, I'd rather stay away from > invisible characters in Org syntax, would it be page breaks or > non-breaking spaces. FWIW I fully support not using invisible chars in Org syntax. -- Bastien