From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Baier Subject: Re: how to group together fields Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: <871tznawcx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fvo5tqvo.fsf@mars.lan> <87fvo4bcjw.fsf@gmail.com> <87r47nshuh.fsf@mars.lan> <87bnyrayda.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwibrs5u.fsf@mars.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Z2n-00006g-SE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 06:47:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Z2f-0007ez-FD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 06:47:29 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]:53404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9Z2f-0007em-BY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 06:47:21 -0500 Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id cm18so7615331qab.40 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 03:47:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87mwibrs5u.fsf@mars.lan> (Stefan Huchler's message of "Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:25:33 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stefan Huchler Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Stefan, again, please sent your mail also to the org mailing list. Just do a follow-up in your mail client, instead of a reply, that should do the right thing I guess. On 2014-02-01 12:25 Stefan Huchler wrote: > Hello Alex, > > thats exactly what don=C2=B4t want ^^. I tried something similar a while = ago > with TBLFM function but it did not work. > > I dont care to much about how I can do it, how exactly I manage the data > (in lists in attributes in tables) I just don=C2=B4t want redundancy. > > It should be no rocket science, so I can reproduce it, if nothing else > maybe you could generate org-trees from this or so. This can surely be done by using the mapping api I referenced in the first post. You need to know some elisp for this thought. But I would be willing to post something along those lines, if you wanted to go down that way. Putting the collected data into an org-tree or presenting it in another way should be doable, too. > Its sad all data is there but because org-mode dont know something like > group by, its not working. > > it would be very powerful, I thought thats what org-mode/emacs is all > about. Well, the question is, if you want to implement a whole database upon the org-format.