From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: emacs calc and src block editing
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 19:11:53 +0000
Message-ID: <871tzls51i.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87fvocw7is.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <52E595CA.3020902@miszellen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36417)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1WA2ZQ-0008T8-7D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:19:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1WA2ZJ-0002cM-9Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:19:08 -0500
Received: from tx2outboundsmtppool1.messaging.microsoft.com
	([65.55.83.131]:7016 helo=TX2EHSNDR001.bigfish.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1WA2ZJ-0002cE-2x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:19:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <52E595CA.3020902@miszellen.de> (Florian Beck's message of "Mon,
	27 Jan 2014 00:10:02 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Florian Beck <fb@miszellen.de>
Cc: Emacs Org mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Florian Beck <fb@miszellen.de> writes:

> On 25.01.2014 13:49, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
>> There is a niggling aspect of editing source code blocks.  If, while in
>> the src block buffer (reached by C-c '), if you start up calc and
>> request "calc-copy-to-buffer" to place a result in the source code being
>> edited, the copy is actually placed in the original org buffer and
>> subsequently lost when exiting the src buffer.  In my opinion, the copy
>> should be place in the src buffer at point.
>
> It is a feature of calc, not to copy to internal (starred) buffers.

Ah.  Okay, that's fine then.

Thanks for your suggested advice.  I haven't tried it yet but have made
a note of it.
-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.2.5h-585-g5f0ca0