From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:13:17 +0100 Message-ID: <871ty0edg2.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <87wqg0gawq.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhwgettp.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87bnxbg02x.fsf@gmail.com> <87ha73dnxe.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87zjku41nq.fsf@gmail.com> <878usdemuv.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87eh25d22d.fsf@gmail.com> <874n31dvf8.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <8738ik8rod.fsf@gmail.com> <871ty3tt8r.fsf@gmail.com> <8761ne270h.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPeqq-00051t-U3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:13:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPeqj-0006i5-Kr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:13:40 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPeqj-0006hy-Du for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:13:33 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPeqi-0002bY-FG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:13:32 +0100 Received: from vpn-2094.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.94]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:13:32 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2094.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:13:32 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas and Eric, Eric Schulte writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Eric Schulte writes: >> >>> This sounds like a good compromise to me. As you say, this should >>> easily and visually support both use cases and is intuitive. I've not >>> touched the export machinery myself, so I'll leave the implementation to >>> Nicolas but I definitely support this approach. >> >> Here are the patches, with tests. I leave to someone else the >> documentation part in the manual. >> > > Applied with documentation. Thanks, > Thank you very much! - Andreas