From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Filtering org-clock-display Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:26:08 +0200 Message-ID: <871twsjnzz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wbox0-0007Ju-Mm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 06:26:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wbowv-0001Lp-1J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 06:26:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]:58648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wbowu-0001Ks-QI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 06:26:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l18so1852676wgh.7 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 03:26:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Slater's message of "Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:25:56 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Noah Slater Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Noah Slater writes: > What do others think about this idea? I welcome feedback on this but let's take care not to overengineer this: if we add to many features to `org-clock-display', it will blur the line between this temporary display and clock tables. I would first try using temporary clock tables then see if the feature is still need for org-clock-display. Just my 2cts of lets-pretend-laziness-is-carefulness, of course, -- Bastien