From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Org 8 Bug in interactive formula editing mode? Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:39:15 -0400 Message-ID: <871ttd5m4c.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <20140721090925.73e90201@rudi> <20140721155003.52846bb4@rudi> <87k3763jcc.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20140721181458.7e8004db@rudi> <87ppgy1vfx.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20140721203626.2a5294c7@rudi> <20140721211725.2a7cd8c3@rudi> <20140721213627.180c865f@rudi> <53CE0434.4040805@roklein.de> <20140722101445.34ada66d@rudi> <87egxd6a7u.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <20140722190935.03dfdf68@rudi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9e2L-0001gY-0X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:39:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9e2E-00016K-Jg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:39:36 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9e2E-00016F-E7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:39:30 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X9e2D-0007kT-2M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:39:29 +0200 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:39:29 +0200 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:39:29 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten Grothe writes: >> If the frame is bigger than about 50 lines (so that after C-c ', it's >> big enough to show the whole table, including the formula and the empty >> line underneath it) then I don't see the problem. > > Thank you very much for your instructions! > > yes you are right for the org file. I tested Roberts example with your > instructions and after resizing the formula frame a bit it works but > unfortunately this does not work with my attached tex file. For the > first table it works but for the two other tables it does not work > even not if I try to resize the formula window, so that I can see the > whole table and the formula line, sorry about that :-) I throws me to > the end of the buffer again, funny thing :-) > I didn't mean that as a workaround. I meant it as a partial characterization of the problem that might give somebody in the know an idea of where to go looking for it. I believe that you'll have to live with the problem for a while: it might be easy to fix or it might be difficult but until somebody takes a deeper look, we won't know for sure. But IIUC, the problem is a display problem only: you don't see the table while you are editing the formulas, but once you finish and C-c C-c out of the formula editing buffer, everything should be updated properly (well, maybe the table needs to be recalculated - not sure whether that happens automatically or not - but the formulas *should* be updated to reflect your editing). Is my understanding correct? Nick