From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: (Maybe) enhance `org-element-src-block-interpreter'?
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 14:14:40 +0200
Message-ID: <871tsso5sf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87tx5qvrl4.fsf@gmail.com> <87oavywal0.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87fvha81zd.fsf@gmail.com> <87egwt26o3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87wqal7rl8.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqalztmj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87oavx7lgy.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54009)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XFMaF-0005C4-5c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 08:14:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XFMa2-0007GC-5T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 08:14:15 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:53194)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XFMa2-0007Ct-0K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 08:14:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87oavx7lgy.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Wed, 06
	Aug 2014 16:15:41 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com> writes:

> I definitely would have used `org-element-put-property' to modify a
> 'local' parse-tree too, but I can just as well directly use `plist-put'
> on the raw plist in its cdr - would that be the correct way?

You shouldn't do this. Local value is cached and
`org-element-put-property' is destructive. You might break cache.

Applying `org-element-put-property' on a copy of the returned value is
OK, though.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou