From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Possible bug in export of table in latex
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:47:10 +0100
Message-ID: <871tn5qkxd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CABHo5SDcOBLOqj52at1H3ZmmA1N7J5f-veGtzpXNbPFpRMcA-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k30za6c0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CABHo5SCxbuLaTUr2yOCNDgo5n79c=PLHM9CeeSLMuyrLfzYw4g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43588)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Y9GDx-0006MB-4K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:46:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Y9GDt-0003mE-4f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:46:17 -0500
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:43594)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Y9GDs-0003lk-Un
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:46:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CABHo5SCxbuLaTUr2yOCNDgo5n79c=PLHM9CeeSLMuyrLfzYw4g@mail.gmail.com>
	(Giuseppe Lipari's message of "Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:40:01 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Giuseppe Lipari <giulipari@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Giuseppe Lipari <giulipari@gmail.com> writes:

> As a matter of fact, I think the :width option for latex tables should be
> disabled, because it is not so simple to implement.

As long as it doesn't generate invalid LaTeX code (like in your bug
report), I think the current :width option can be kept. You don't need
to use it if you don't like it.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou