From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: Why not push? Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:31:05 +0100 Message-ID: <871tlqx0wm.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> References: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87d25bo3wj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaov3173.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87egprwiim.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87k2zj2wev.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36519) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN7ib-0006Ki-Oj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:31:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN7iY-0002ZG-Fa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:31:13 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:36716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN7iY-0002ZC-9f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:31:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21305207B for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:31:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lt9ILNVy1XQy for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:31:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (117-116.echostar.pl [213.156.117.116]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D5EF52063 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:31:09 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <87k2zj2wev.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2015-02-15, at 13:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Ah well, maybe we'll trick someone else into it :) ;-) > My own personal project is to spend a bit of every day working on the > emacs packages that make my computing life possible: Org, Gnus, and > BBDB. I'd prefer to spend most of it on Org, but the fact is that when > your email setup is broken, that always takes priority. Org and Gnus > both suffer (and both benefit) from wild and messy codebases. Org has > Nicolas to help whip it into shape; Gnus doesn't. That is a good one. It wouldn't work for me, though, for reason I've explained earlier. > If you're just reading code, ox-latex is a great place to start. If > you're fixing code, org-agenda could use some love... Well, since I want to write a modification of the LaTeX exporter, ox-latex seems a natural thing to look at. OTOH, org-agenda looks scary ;-). > Eric Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University