From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Titus von der Malsburg Subject: Re: [Bug] ~Verbatim~ in headlines breaks LaTeX Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:32:49 -0700 Message-ID: <871tho219l.fsf@posteo.de> References: <87382eg2f4.fsf@posteo.de> <87617a65y5.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87vbfa63ud.fsf@posteo.de> <87wpzqxz9m.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twuu5bzv.fsf@posteo.de> <87r3px5ee3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fri6jl7.fsf@posteo.de> <87a8wdongv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878ubx224x.fsf@posteo.de> <87eglpjnxv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1Hxt-0000NX-9f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1Hxq-0000GF-3x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:33:01 -0400 Received: from mx02.posteo.de ([89.146.194.165]:52978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1Hxp-0000GB-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:32:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <87eglpjnxv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015-06-06 Sat 00:28, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> Thee can be handled by protectedtexttt. The obvious questions is of >> course: Wouldn=E2=80=99t it be more consistent to handle all instances o= f ~code~ >> using protectedtexttt? > > One option would be indeed to remove \verb altogether. Note that it is > also used in inline source blocks.=20 > > However, I assume \verb put less limitations than \texttt on its > contents, so I'd rather keep \verb around. > >> And if you want to support the use of \verb at all, shouldn=E2=80=99t th= at be >> done via =3Dverbatim=3D not ~code~? > > I fail to see how it would solve the problem at hand. It would simply > move it elsewhere. I didn=E2=80=99t say it would. I said that using protectedtexttt solves the issue in problematic environments. The issue that =3Dverbatim=3D maps to \texttt and ~code~ to \verb is independent, but since it affects the same code, it might make sense to solve both at the same time. Titus > My question is how to handle \verb at the LaTeX level, not at the Org > one. > >>>> These two did not produce the intended results (sub and super script >>>> don=E2=80=99t work) but the LaTeX is not malformed: >>>> >>>> test^~test~ >>>> test_~test~ >> >> This really seems to be an independent issue (because test^*test* >> doesn=E2=80=99t work either) > > Actually, I just realized this is not valid syntax for sub/superscript > in Org anyway. It should be > > test^{~test~} > > Regards, --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVcy7CAAoJEK40WfPGE2idLNQH/0OwtaIahzywPzbS6cfqbRVQ xW2RSwvI1qJqd44GP9gLUaprvmDT6KL/pTAsEt8hFr76qlwzBRPAIkP42pSkzv63 D4dq/R/MHzEA7ECQEFAeqoEoUkcsta/w3uYaDD3EDfVqMj4QOYCDkUc3U7VnpTBB 58tNtEmvRSkrKm11039R4C5HOjAKlowx3NnkKqJaQWPZ6ONpbpClbZ+5XoQLZUPF DI/NumEXp6acgSUUDKzsWBI/YauD86SrErHU6C5z4WpZMLqcxXlQTTuiF2/BR1Ra xfVP6UDprDNXh0oU3vtxR+TH1Qw2mlD5GPNYZBQ4FeoqajRYflVijPxlKuduAuc= =GnAk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--