From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Exporting multiple images in a float (LaTeX) Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 21:23:57 +0200 Message-ID: <871tfdy46q.fsf@gmx.us> References: <20150806164208.GB2797@chitra.no-ip.org> <87bnekkq81.fsf@gmx.us> <877fp8kq0m.fsf@gmx.us> <20150807042442.GD28462@chitra.no-ip.org> <87r3nfgrc5.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <20150807141400.GH28462@chitra.no-ip.org> <874mkbnpmz.fsf@gmx.us> <87mvy3gjg9.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZO9j1-00007K-Cd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:24:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZO9iy-0004jS-76 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:24:11 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZO9iy-0004jF-0b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:24:08 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZO9iw-0001So-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 21:24:06 +0200 Received: from p5b0dcb05.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.13.203.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 21:24:06 +0200 Received: from rasmus by p5b0dcb05.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 21:24:06 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > On Friday, 7 Aug 2015 at 16:23, Rasmus wrote: > > [...] > >> I guess there would also be no loss from actually inserting a "%" after >> \includegraphics[·]{·} in ox-latex. > > Except that then the suggestion I just made would not work and would in > fact be quite confusing as the second figure would be lost in the > export? But we can insert "%\n" and in the latex end there's no difference between \includegraphics[]{}% \includegraphics[]{}% And \includegraphics[]{}\includegraphics[]{}% To the best of my knowledge. Rasmus -- Slowly unravels in a ball of yarn and the devil collects it