From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joost Helberg <joost@snow.nl>
Subject: Re: :noweb no-export and syntax highlighting upon export to html
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 11:39:54 +0100
Message-ID: <871tc0kc5h.fsf@snow.nl>
References: <87si4kk75o.fsf@snow.nl> <87k2pwv71t.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42030)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <joost@snow.nl>) id 1ZvNOQ-0004Z3-VF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 05:40:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <joost@snow.nl>) id 1ZvNOL-0003wR-UU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 05:40:14 -0500
Received: from mx.snow.nl ([213.154.248.146]:52710)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <joost@snow.nl>) id 1ZvNOL-0003vz-Kx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 05:40:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <87k2pwv71t.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Dear Aaron,

I was running close to the development version, but not close
enough. It's solved now in the current version of org-mode.

At first I accepted this odd behaviour, but then I realized htmlize is
supposed to give you what you see on screen, hence this was a bug.

regards,

Joost

>>>>> "Aaron" =3D=3D Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:
 > From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
 > To: Joost Helberg <joost@snow.nl>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
 > Subject: Re: [O] :noweb no-export and syntax highlighting upon export
 > Date: 2015-11-05T15:45:34+0100

 > Hi Joost,

 > Org=E2=80=99s html export relies on the syntax of the source block bei=
ng valid
 > in the block=E2=80=99s language, for the corresponding emacs major mod=
e to
 > highlight it properly.  In general, I wouldn=E2=80=99t rely on it beha=
ving
 > properly in the presence of unexpanded noweb references.  That said...

 > 2015ko azaroak 5an, Joost Helberg-ek idatzi zuen:
 >>=20
 >> ls,
 >>=20
 >> In the org-code below syntax highlighting in both code-blocks in the
 >> emacs-buffer is fine, but the html-export only works nice in case of
 >> using :noweb yes, the no-export option screws up syntax highlighting =
in
 >> the html-output (two screenshots included).
 >>=20
 >> I understood that htmlize is used for html-export and that it honours
 >> the faces in the emacs-buffer. It seems as if htmlize doesn't do this
 >> after encountering the '>>' token.

 > Your example works fine for me on latest org master.  Can you send you=
r
 > org version?  (M-x org-version)  What happens if you insert the code f=
or
 > t1 into an sh-mode buffer: is it highlighted as expected?

 > --=20
 > Aaron Ecay


--=20
Snow B.V.