From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Conditional link export?
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 16:04:51 +0100
Message-ID: <871tc08rcc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87ziyri8lk.fsf@gmail.com> <878u6buupy.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87d1vmgdt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87fv0hubym.fsf@gmail.com>
	<874mgwd1mi.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9kw8t1t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87h9kwbkv2.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54103)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZvRUq-00016s-Cf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:03:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZvRUp-00060J-Cx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:03:08 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:51039)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZvRUp-00060F-6D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:03:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87h9kwbkv2.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleh Krehel's message of "Sun, 08 Nov
	2015 15:56:33 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Oleh Krehel <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Oleh Krehel <ohwoeowho@gmail.com> writes:

> Is that a new feature?

It is probably almost as old as Babel itself.

> First time I've heard about it, and I did google
> for inline code block evaluation before.

You should check the Org manual first: 

  (info "(org) Structure of code blocks")

> In any case, the HTML export result of e.g. this:
>
>     The current time is: src_emacs-lisp{(format "<a href=%S>%s</a>" "http://google.com" (format-time-string "%H:%M"))}.
>
> is:
>
>     The current time is: <code>&lt;a href</code>"<a href="http://google.com/">http://google.com/</a>"&gt;15:50&lt;/a&gt;=.
>
> which is far from what I want.

Try

    The current time is: src_emacs-lisp[:results html]{(format "<a href=%S>%s</a>" "http://google.com" (format-time-string "%H:%M"))}.

> And I still think that Elisp could benefit from privileged call
> syntax. Compare:
>
>     !(foo)
>
> to
>
>     src_emacs-lisp{(foo)}

I'm not a big fan of redundant syntax. Also, I'm trying to move Org
format out of Elisp's grasp. This doesn't help much either.

> Additionally `org-edit-src-code' doesn't work for these blocks.

Do you want to provide a patch for it?


Regards,