Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> writes:
>
>> OK, I've worked up a patch that solves several of these issues. The
>> basic idea is to check when publishing an org file whether it includes
>> other org files and then to store that data in the cache. That way,
>> org-publish-cache-file-needs-publishing does not need to open each
>> buffer but rather can compare the stored timestamp data against the
>> actual modified times of the included files.
>
> This is much better, indeed. Thank you.
>
> One suggestion: wouldn't it make sense to also apply check to SETUPFILE
> keywords?

Yes, that's a great idea. I've added it to the patch.

One caveat: this patch does not implement recursive checking of included
files (i.e., included files that include other files), but this could be
added in the future.

Thanks,
Matt