From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Add 'none setting for
 org-agenda-overriding-header
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:07:55 +0200
Message-ID: <871so9nt04.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87k22416un.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87bmnep8yz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<8760dmynkk.fsf@alphapapa.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49483)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1didG3-0000v2-IS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 05:08:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1didG2-0002Wp-Ox
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 05:07:59 -0400
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::194]:58252)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1didG2-0002VY-Im
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 05:07:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8760dmynkk.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Thu, 17
	Aug 2017 14:57:31 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:

> I almost did that, making it not insert a header if it was set to an
> empty string, but I thought that this approach gives more flexibility,
> allowing users to insert a blank header if they want.

"\n" would allow to insert a blank header.

> But if you would prefer it that way, I'll adjust the patch. Let me
> know.

Let's adjust the patch, then. Thank you!

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou