From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Should wip-cite branch be merged to master? Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: <871sf9f2ak.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <29b94436.a1e.162e54aa7c1.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9mup-0000Z2-VX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 03:26:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9mum-0003Ap-1b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 03:26:35 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:50059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9mul-0003AQ-R5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 03:26:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <29b94436.a1e.162e54aa7c1.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> (tumashu@163.com's message of "Sat, 21 Apr 2018 07:01:37 +0800 (CST)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: tumashu Cc: emacs-orgmode , Simonyi =?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A1s?= , John Kitchin Hello, tumashu writes: > There is a package which support wip-cite: https://github.com/andras-simo= nyi/citeproc-org, should wip-cite branch > be merged to master now? Merging wip-cite branch with master, and integration of citeproc-org into Org core, could be discussed with the author of the library, and, of course, with anyone interested in using the @cite syntax. For example, I need to know if that syntax, along with citeproc-org, covers enough use-cases for citations, if it brings more value than using, e.g., Org Ref, which already exists, how it could be improved, etc. I also remember that Christian Moe suggested an alternate syntax for citations. He might want to point out what is missing from @cite syntax and if he still prefers his idea. I have the feeling that it is a bit early for Org 9.2. Anyway, I'm Cc'ing Andr=C3=A1s and John for their opinion about it. I'd love to hear fr= om everyone involved in the last round of discussion about the subject, too. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou