From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: exporting drawers: odt versus LaTeX Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:17:38 +0100 Message-ID: <871sf3olml.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bme929jf.fsf@gmail.com> <87wowxobqc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fu3lyxjn.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87efj5njhx.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bme9dmtz.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <874lk0mgb4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBDkQ-0007ob-Tt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 02:17:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBDkM-0005rS-S6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 02:17:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:53475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBDkM-0005rE-KK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 02:17:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 66so5036048wmd.3 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:17:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874lk0mgb4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:43:11 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, 24 Apr 2018 at 23:43, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Eric S Fraga writes: > >> We may have to agree to disagree here. > > I'm not sure what we have to agree to disagree on.=20 :-) I think simply that the outcome on export is qualitatively different depending on target: for LaTeX, the drawer is not (necessarily) a new paragraph whereas for ODT it is. This bothers me =C3=A6sthetically and does make writing filters etc. more difficult but it's not a deal breaker! > I'm just describing how the Org syntax works. This is documented at > . Yes, I understand. I am definitely not disagreeing about how org parses the elements, simply how it exports them. thanks, eric =2D-=20 Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50, Org release_9.1.6-419-g52ba1a --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSPXCedOQfhSlwpVw3IkZPY//z2fQUCWuAdggAKCRDIkZPY//z2 fb+6AJwJYZVJPZIauHAAHR3+f9Oa4Pa/0gCgj45MGeqKsRg211llTCHDiJUWI+E= =pL2C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--