From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: Orgalist notes Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 09:04:25 -0700 Message-ID: <871seo4vp2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <871ses9vg4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lgd0ezli.fsf@gmail.com> <87bmdv9awd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ljmnxjv.fsf@len.workgroup> <87r2mqclm8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sh754q02.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a7tcsvi9.fsf@norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFMC0-00072t-6D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 12:07:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFMBw-0006eh-3l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 12:07:20 -0400 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([50.56.99.223]:48184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFMBv-0006a4-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 12:07:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a7tcsvi9.fsf@norang.ca> (Bernt Hansen's message of "Sun, 06 May 2018 10:34:38 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bernt Hansen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 05/06/18 10:34 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> And, as always, thank you! This is fairly heroic work -- I say that >> after having made an attempt at orgstruct-mode, and run away screaming. >> And look, no funny indentation! >> >> - Yet a list item with a ridiculous amount of text in it does not wrap >> into a second list item. >> - Neither does the second list item, despite having an equivalent amount >> of spurious typing in it. >> >> - And before I get tired of the experiment, here's the same thing with >> a numbered list. >> - Oh damn, I hit M-RET, and the numbered list turned into an unnumbered >> list. >> >> No good deed goes unpunished :) > > I think you need 2 blank lines between the lists to separate them by > default - otherwise they are treated as one list and the first bullet > defines the type of list (and therefore changes your 1. back to - You're quite right! That did the trick. All seems to be behaving perfectly now. Thanks, Eric