From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Barros Subject: Re: Org-mode latex pdf export issue: Underlined lines not breaking properly Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:53:43 -0300 Message-ID: <871ry8bdo8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130306115906.GT7544@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <20130306140248.GX7544@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87vc5nve0n.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvwqeu4o.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org> <87ppvsonjt.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo7cdcrf.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org> <87li6gok59.fsf@gmail.com> <877gi0da9k.fsf@news.tumashu-localhost.org> <871u84iiek.fsf@gmail.com> <8736iobefh.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsFSf-0008F8-3b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:53:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsFSe-0000Xz-7G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:53:49 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]:35833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsFSe-0000XY-19 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 19:53:48 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id d23so61316086qto.2 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:53:47 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <8736iobefh.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Feng Shu , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mon, Jul 29 2019, Gustavo Barros wrote: > > But the ability to have line breaks is a clear edge > of soul, and the reason of the original request which started this > thread. > I must correct myself, the difference between ulem and soul is not that one allows line breaks while the other does not. More precisely, both handle line breaks, but soul is able to honor hyphenation patterns, while ulem is not. If one wants a (underlined/stricken-through) word to break with ulem, the hyphenation has to be done manually. Best, Gustavo.