From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8EE+EjfkXGOEKwEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:28:39 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id OBk0ETfkXGMgTwAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:28:39 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2122BD4FA for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:28:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oohBx-0007Ca-9K; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 04:27:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oohBu-0007CC-Uz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 04:27:42 -0400 Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oohBq-0003DD-DH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 04:27:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F8553003DA; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:27:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgI_Lza0E7tR; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:27:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (178235147169.dynamic-3-poz-k-0-1-0.vectranet.pl [178.235.147.169]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 077EB5F8E32; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:27:29 +0200 (CEST) References: <8735b7bst1.fsf@mbork.pl> <87pmeblisu.fsf@localhost> User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 29.0.50 From: Marcin Borkowski To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: Org-Mode mailing list Subject: Re: Org mode, Org Mode, Org-mode or Org-Mode? In-reply-to: <87pmeblisu.fsf@localhost> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:27:29 +0200 Message-ID: <871qqruj9q.fsf@mbork.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.110.48.8; envelope-from=mbork@mbork.pl; helo=mail.mojserwer.eu X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-TUID: i9CnkhVN5wFi On 2022-10-28, at 23:50, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> What is the "official" version? I found at least two spelling on >> orgmode.org... > > If we look into doc/Documentation_Standards.org: > > - Prefer "Org mode" to "Org-mode" or "org-mode". This is simply > because it reflects an existing convention in [[info:emacs:Top][The Emacs Manual]] which > consistently documents mode names in this form - "Text mode", > "Outline mode", "Mail mode", etc. > > It is _the_ convention. Thanks! > Another question is whether we actually follow it everywhere... Yep... -- Marcin Borkowski http://mbork.pl