From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id gAXDKv9vrWVJgQAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:26:55 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id gAXDKv9vrWVJgQAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:26:55 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=VLn1J35R; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705865215; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZISj991o6nWrrqtL7pQ/utX///pHVwofo6YxYuWg5bkwbEGyMbOglTa28pyvD4T7+qq9uo akOthOq1aRwGOhvdBDTtDdb2P4ASDxOnf36T2A9cdlJGJTTfbng882To5haNbNVy9q70in DR/kwZWknGLWefojnk9vw4co8fLr8EpBuyibchkt39m8v+YGtFCsPT7KlNFPvXtSAXODSL EmuIWIDEkWpUnMJwKwxObiXGLgUT622q4/ol92b98yMSAuVnKYOzGEnugv0Zaa1NCX64y0 iwBSn+Iw9FuNJTTmZiIKWWIhcNeSeL3a8mZrTZA8HUl9yIfFvkKCs9M3ed7OHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=VLn1J35R; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705865215; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=5tPuW4EfRzVDlUYsxX8Lu6il++yL7FBX56K/+zyNRNU=; b=QmAbfeJgsgwDTfLVkceoaL9QWtZfOZpqR6NaIsNKKWZxm26fdSI4pwVC0MtGnsERzYkvrd 5eM+8c4kaihLwUCcrfIY6GS/LeBOUGCmlVY4oFAKHVEXrcFdXLtAWm3m1HUe/g70bERtfr RW3CP/ZI3/LGV6qymu1O6/qFAImCTpMwJfvvkMtTGrnii/sBeU5BcNOFU0uHQ78chqKKOF a34mXPFkYmoerPsRyLC3wfcvcawOPE859yElsRtdBgjg2T9HMdK8by5s/8ZcqsA65fUCya ML3qagtkwD6HWbjkYWieCpVZ6sjmXtp6xJpgTgSzPdg75m1pJ9rgekccfhJb0Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16A79EEDB for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:26:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRdSJ-0007Ry-0D; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:26:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRdSH-0007Rk-NS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:26:05 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRdSD-00024R-1b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:26:05 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30E6240101 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:25:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1705865158; bh=vNRfg/bfV/S9T8C1/NlfIXyiRg0AidE1qUN4+dC9AOA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=VLn1J35Rkpf2N6k3KnWCRq7C1lap+wlp+yrV1ZVjfDdWebJQ/j/XlTkW3I1OJw9pA oLXeJLKd6F/m753N9oPJ1B5XcJUjGeJWAIfqGZ2toM8jq0unHQ8CV3qkkVlnGPX0sX qKf2xphGJwoDbCjqWpm3XgoldfVDh/1jV+63xYnkDOjWvXWaJbp++/Yo0om8ysu4/E PGY8WczDeepbiQpTN1P/AMFguZTEZEBN73opK5eE7JGrNQ7RIad5Pz1yg1fKgRmb3B Sg5HwebfyeasAdpyUWYMRxpCTuEm73JHRRM+0Usa0PULNltACFj8i8GW5ULR3bScw+ 6I5IZPs3yOCrQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TJ3H95jKsz6twb; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 20:25:57 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: orgmode , Max Nikulin Subject: Re: [possible patch] Remove the '\\[0pt]' string from the last line of a verse block in LaTeX export In-Reply-To: <87mssyg5ur.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:42:52 +0000") References: <874jfvjo2k.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu5uv7c.fsf@localhost> <878r4tfccn.fsf@posteo.net> <87zfx9t7di.fsf@localhost> <87wmsddlw5.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0ikrt5h.fsf@localhost> <87o7dnefwo.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu1l69f.fsf@localhost> <87il3tax9a.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uwjerg.fsf@localhost> <87o7dju9vn.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uuaj11.fsf@localhost> <87h6j96xn5.fsf@posteo.net> <871qac6v5j.fsf@localhost> <87o7dgf8bb.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7dg5d8f.fsf@localhost> <87frysf1wf.fsf@posteo.net> <875xzn6dw3.fsf@localhost> <878r4jg37s.fsf@posteo.net> <87mssyg5ur.fsf@localhost> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:25:55 +0000 Message-ID: <871qaa32v0.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -7.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 16A79EEDB X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.39 X-TUID: jHobICgh/I98 Ihor Radchenko writes: > Upon looking closer into selective removal, it turned out to be more > tricky than I thought. I'm afraid that using \\[0pt] only in some places > may become a bit of headache to maintain - we may accidentally break > certain regexp replacements in `org-latex-verse-block'. In particular, > when verse contents is not straightforward and uses \\[0pt]. > > Given that `org-latex-line-break-safe' also introduced the problem with > verse blocks, I decided that it is better to remove it at the end. LaTeX code generated without org-latex-line-break-safe is much cleaner. The decision to make this variable obsolete seems correct to me, if there is already a better and more discreet solution. I don't know if it will cause many problems with custom settings and filters written in relation to this variable, as Maxim commented in a previous email... I hope not. I have a couple of filters written already, but I don't think it will take much work for me to readjust them. Best regards, Juan Manuel