From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id GK5pL44qvWViNwAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 18:46:54 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GK5pL44qvWViNwAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 18:46:54 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=WnafzM2u; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1706896014; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EfzmXvmVL2rilaOSdXaSLSyXDaI+a0fcC+jN4SUa/YGJV33czqVzAMcqrkR45C9XJWFxFc /bsp/OpD/f8qTa4O85q2m/t/zmNXaz8FyDiH01Xhn27TTHajMUTq0LOXhipsmAlBNIi5LR fFZVStc0aOezXRVvt/eYf/AG3wTMhkRCkq33gPLtH88cC89ND/dSxUog5bzypOwuJLxBQ3 MOC4klzciNrCT5fKS+sFBqfjUFPo7WjziM+q4O3Zb/fFYfBbO4dIIKK05sRAYL7dZmlNg2 y4nPhSUlT1bV16q6TjsNXlMQfLDBfFlwKm0ju8SrTWPfNck9dIK3dMc+3cpwVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=WnafzM2u; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1706896014; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=p30BRepdAIHfM4dhObvbQ7/i0YCI0u2H/IwQVziXMJ8=; b=o3VqPY0scE/yoTkb61FE9e/8aEZfksFh8cInfSFnvuEo/oXP8OaT/bbqnNkMQto1oi7uF7 Dx3UUby7e3l1pkoGurviavOQ8JJizj5mDeZrMcouzdl4zeZsea39CMJ58LDsDv+9Yy41t/ oM4a284QzZ4GZUZlm218uHa+EMy+/FCtDn5R452/X+02sZ9x5I9dq7dRGk3EFX9JiqQjxP xyWhQtrtGt5F990FVnlSoN3r9El6k+GmfZZJqj12ZyEvsXV9vjx/SAwZJdhM3y/r06oLDt RXnGkzT9c4GU3Uz8ibAxU9x/aEBsZ3xsW2mNhBZdNUfxm3YXed2qp1yaX0FU6w== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834BF762C5 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:46:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVxcM-0006p9-HO; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:46:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVxcK-0006ot-UR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:46:20 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVxcJ-00060X-83 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:46:20 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D93B24002A for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:46:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1706895971; bh=p30BRepdAIHfM4dhObvbQ7/i0YCI0u2H/IwQVziXMJ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=WnafzM2uX9GIVIzxz36r2YaN6a5lUTNszD4Brmkxq498sV6f024rU9qevIDD3w+d0 zlmqVcZjaG7KHeBeSgwotknatFVBoT9ja/pVYWbfolCzydXK6M9akhLCLb/omV7SsF hD0G1PTK1xZRnRqDlg6R6nH96kl79xnHwAGoTZbNzL5Edems9odxjSNraPVLh2TqDU Q0aWGE2CSa7lbkYSxHNvK9liNbjzIOFuXnEV7XgQL5WHSYGDEnPNizHhhcXLP6jV2O yRE7zlm7HGO+dHDDpdxIWd1ot0rfzxIVxxadfUC6zwcck5Z0EZZ0XaQuOlbTc+f8LI iMxXS4wsg73Gg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TRNVV4xK2z6txq; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:46:10 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Marvin =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BClker?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc) In-Reply-To: <874jeqokii.fsf@guelker.eu> References: <87sf2ngcd2.fsf@localhost> <691643eb-49d0-45c3-ab7f-a1edbd093bef@gmail.com> <878r4e4uy0.fsf@posteo.net> <87h6j2vjd0.fsf@yandex.com> <874jf24u3r.fsf@posteo.net> <875xzgfe8b.fsf@localhost> <87le84i6qz.fsf@localhost> <878r44m650.fsf@posteo.net> <874jequ7he.fsf@localhost> <874jeqokii.fsf@guelker.eu> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 17:49:36 +0000 Message-ID: <871q9uu573.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -6.90 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 834BF762C5 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.90 X-TUID: F7W4HRhLijAd Marvin G=C3=BClker writes: > Am Freitag, dem 02. Februar 2024 schrieb Ihor Radchenko: >> What if you have multiple authors? > > At least in my discipline, we only have one footnote even in such a > case, which then is a little longer and describes each author > individually in a separate sentence. So, one AUTHOR_FN keyword would be > enough for me. Single footnote is certainly not always a standard. You may check a random article from ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090123221001491 Or, as a terminal case, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04277 with 1000+ authors. (well, they do put a single footnote there and move all the authors to separate page). --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at