From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Syntax of Org Babel ":results" header argument Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:06:37 +0100 Message-ID: <86zjy0fp6a.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <86li9v1nb0.fsf@somewhere.org> <86mwu59eev.fsf@somewhere.org> <87obei1l7w.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87li9l3e8i.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2uxaz9u.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello all, Andreas Leha wrote: > tsd-P0awH739Ni4AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org (Thomas S. Dye) writes: >> Eric Schulte writes: >>> Bastien writes: >>>> "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >>>> >>>>> As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to either >>>>> have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go". >>>> >>>> I tend to agree with Jay here and I prefer the minimalist syntax, >>>> although values for the :results parameter are heterogeneous. >>> >>> +1 for maintaining the existing concise syntax. >> >> +1 for stable syntax. > > +1 one more vote I've got the authoritative answers I was expecting. It was just a RFI. Case is closed! Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban