From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Vauban Subject: Re: wish: provide flush_right/right_aligned text rendering directive Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:26:12 +0200 Message-ID: <86zjiaf9l7.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <20140510135216.GA2041@boo.workgroup> <878upvsw1u.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20140521073916.GA25852@boo.workgroup> <87sio3ic8y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877g5f1dso.fsf@gmail.com> <878upvw9yr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8738g31cfg.fsf@gmail.com> <87egznutrb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwebyzcr.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4xvjfjk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ioozyuuf.fsf@gmail.com> <87k39fje7m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877g5ezspi.fsf@gmail.com> <868upugp7u.fsf@somewhere.org> <87fvk29ntu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Bastien wrote: > Sebastien Vauban > writes: > >> Do I understand correctly that those won't be converted to their >> HTML and LaTeX counterparts (flushright and raggedleft)? > > For HTML, the user can define a new class "justifyright". > > For LaTeX, yes, we should probably handle this as \begin{flushright}. > >> Shouldn't it be better to make that conversion as well for the back-ends >> which support such features? > > When it comes to consistency, I kinda fully trust Nicolas, don't worry. So do I! ;-) > I guess it's just a matter of taking the time to polish this a bit. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban