From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Subject: Re: [contacts] No completion in Gnus Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:20:29 +0200 Message-ID: <86wrcjcvnm.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <86pqicblti.fsf@googlemail.com> <81ehysplrb.fsf@gmail.com> <86ipo4bisx.fsf@googlemail.com> <874nznx5tl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBTHA-0003JF-N6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:20:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBTH9-0007XY-Js for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:20:52 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBTH9-0007XJ-Ek for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:20:51 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBTH7-0000MC-AN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:20:49 +0200 Received: from g231234062.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.234.62]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:20:49 +0200 Received: from quintfall by g231234062.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:20:49 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > The current release version for Emacs is 23.3. > > I've switched to Emacs24 about half a year ago (they are just now going > into pre-test, so things should stabilize) and it has been smooth > sailing for me, but I'd recommend to keep the 23.3 version around as a > fallback. There are quite a few changes vs. Emacs23 that you may have > to think about, read the NEWS file. I've compiled Emacs24 myself (from > Git), most pre-compiled packages represent a much older state from the > beginning of this year. I've backed out a dodgy change once or twice > and this is so much easier to do in Git; even though there would have > been other workarounds. Since I always expect unexpected things to happen when upgrading, I would rather go directly to Emacs 24 when its more or less stable already - and thats what it seems to be. I might use the opportunity to change from 32bit to 64bit, from Ubuntu to Arch Linux (which looks good) and from Gnome to Stump-WM. That looks like a nice combination to me. Cheers -- Thorsten