From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: New exporter and dates in tables Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:07:08 +0200 Message-ID: <86vc7qrvgj.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87fvz1opiz.fsf@norang.ca> <8761zxwlvn.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9pntym.fsf@norang.ca> <0604BF00-1FE8-4EAA-A346-C125A5127CAD@gmail.com> <877gkcvm3n.fsf@gmail.com> <173ADFE7-A1FB-4ECB-A78A-C99662A8030F@gmail.com> <87fvyysghk.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9mh6ex.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2u1s3wf.fsf@gmail.com> <8738uxrrtc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwt2aefz.fsf@gmail.com> <874nfa34vj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehee9vz6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Bastien writes: > >> I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend >> `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices: >> >> 'inactive-not-standalone >> 'active-not-standalone >> 'not-standalone > > This is a different idea. The change would happen at the exporter level, > not at parser's. > >> When set to 'not-standalone, it means export time-stamps except >> "standone time-stamps", i.e. those who are alone on a line. > > Well, parsing is not line based, and "a timestamp alone on a line" > doesn't mean much. Though, "a timestamp alone in a paragraph" is much > easier to translate. IOW: > > <2013-04-13 Sat> > is not a standalone timestamp (use M-q). > > but, > > <2013-04-13 Sat> > > is a standalone timestamp. Wouldn't it be a good moment to introduce APPT: <2013-04-13 Sat> or maybe better named EVENT: <2013-04-13 Sat> for things that only apply for today? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban