From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aric Gregson Subject: Re: Source Code Header Not Honored in Exportation? Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 19:09:15 -0700 Message-ID: <86tx5mfm7o.fsf@freeenv.ad.medctr.ucla.edu> References: <8638d6h2fd.fsf@freeenv.ad.medctr.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFw6I-0006ds-Cf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 22:09:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFw6A-0005K9-Pz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 22:09:42 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFw6A-0005J0-JO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 22:09:34 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XFw67-0003GX-KS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 04:09:32 +0200 Received: from 149.142.83.142 ([149.142.83.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 04:09:31 +0200 Received: from aorchid by 149.142.83.142 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 04:09:31 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aric Gregson writes: > I am trying to export via org-odt and do not want some of the R source > run during export. For these blocks I have the following: > > #+begin_src R :eval no > > However, it seems that they are still being evaluated, despite having > refreshed the local set-up. Is this not the correct header to tell org > not to evaluate the code block? It seems that the file was actually not getting refreshed. Closing and opening the file caused the headers to be noticed and the evaluation was not carried out, just as desired. Thanks, Aric