From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: time stamps in table of contents Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:48:39 +0100 Message-ID: <86pq057thk.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <7C4694CF-BA10-41B1-97F1-0244BEC0E288@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > this is a question for CSS experts. > > I am trying to get rid of time stamps in HTML export. So I am using a CSS > file which contains among other things: > > #table-of-contents { > font-size: 100%; > position: fixed; > display: block; > left: 10px; > top: 164px; > width: 300px; > bottom: 2px; > line-height: 1.0em; > overflow: auto; > border-style:none; > } > > #table-of-contents timestamp { > display:none; > } > > > One of the lines in the table of contents looks like this: > >
  • <2013-01-11 Fr> Carsten: Wiskunde als de taal van de Natuur
    • > > So I had been hoping this would get rid of the timestamp in the table of > context. It does not. Does anyone know why? You don't use the `>' selector for direct child, so that shouldn't be the problem (the fact that timestamp is not a direct child, but a grandchild). Don't you forget the `.' in front of timestamp, for the "class" spec? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban