From: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:40:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86pplpw4th.fsf@somewhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAJcAo8tDPQd5AZBQOTERdpAqUUxTfeSfCYpiauonEa0xywgLzw@mail.gmail.com
Samuel Wales wrote:
>> No. This has been raised previously and there was a consensus that it
>> is often desirable for code in a COMMENT section to be evaluated on
>> export. Personally I often stuff code blocks into COMMENT sections
>> which I want run as part of my publishing process (e.g., to create
>> resources used in the exported document).
>
> i won't go against consensus, but to me the expectation is that it
> acts just like commented lines.
>
> for your use case, could you use a section marked noexport or
> org-export-with-tasks? i would use the latter.
I was thinking as well that this had been discussed previously, and that
the decision had been:
- COMMENT is equivalent to "noexport" and "noeval", i.e. no code blocks
are run
- "noexport" just does that: no export, but code blocks can be run.
But I don't find any evidence of this. I must have misunderstood.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-11 12:47 Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported zwz
2014-03-11 13:27 ` Ken Mankoff
2014-03-11 13:41 ` Andreas Leha
2014-03-11 13:57 ` Ken Mankoff
2014-03-12 10:53 ` zwz
2014-03-12 22:58 ` Andreas Leha
2014-03-13 14:24 ` Eric Schulte
2014-03-13 22:48 ` Andreas Leha
2014-03-14 1:03 ` Eric Schulte
2014-03-14 5:44 ` Samuel Wales
2014-03-14 13:02 ` zwz
2014-03-14 19:10 ` Samuel Wales
2014-03-14 5:48 ` Samuel Wales
2014-03-14 8:40 ` Sebastien Vauban [this message]
2014-03-14 8:41 ` Andreas Leha
2014-03-14 19:59 ` Eric Schulte
2014-03-15 13:54 ` zwz
2014-03-15 14:46 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-16 2:48 ` Eric Schulte
2014-03-17 21:13 ` Andreas Leha
2014-03-24 15:15 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-24 16:05 ` Eric Schulte
2014-03-24 16:21 ` Bastien
2014-03-24 17:28 ` Eric Schulte
2014-03-24 18:06 ` Samuel Wales
2014-03-24 18:49 ` Samuel Wales
2014-03-14 1:10 ` John Hendy
2014-03-14 8:34 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-03-11 14:03 ` Rainer M Krug
2014-03-12 9:23 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-03-12 10:46 ` zwz
2014-03-12 11:02 ` zwz
2014-03-12 15:00 ` John Hendy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86pplpw4th.fsf@somewhere.org \
--to=sva-news-d0wtavr13harg/idocfnwg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).