From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtidWc/XSBvcmctY29weS1mYWNlIGRvZXNu4oCZdCBhZGQg?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ZmFjZXMgdG8gb3JnLWZhY2VzIGN1c3RvbWl6ZSBncm91cA==?=
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:00:55 +0200
Message-ID: <86ppemush4.fsf@somewhere.org>
References: <87tx4yu2su.fsf@gmail.com> <86k35rldto.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87wq9pssuo.fsf@gmail.com> <86d2am1xp4.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87y4tant6v.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org

Hi Aaron,

Aaron Ecay wrote:
> 2014ko irailak 23an, Sebastien Vauban-ek idatzi zuen:
>> Aaron Ecay wrote:
>>> 2014ko abuztuak 29an, Sebastien Vauban-ek idatzi zuen:
>>>> I think it's related to an Emacs bug (#16440) which I reported on the
>>>> Org mailing list in February.
>>>=20
>>> I don=E2=80=99t completely understand what is going on in that bug repo=
rt.  My
>>> proposal is to convert org-copy-face to defface.
>>=20
>> I think this is "the right thing" (TM).
>>=20
>>> I can=E2=80=99t tell if this would fix your problem or not, but if it=
=E2=80=99s
>>> exclusive to the faces I listed in my previous email the answer is
>>> probably =E2=80=9Cyes.=E2=80=9D
>>=20
>> From what I can see, yes, the faces which are wrongly displayed (before
>> re-applying the theme) match the ones defined by `org-copy-face'.  So,
>> this seems the right way to go.
>
> OK, thanks for the followup.  I=E2=80=99m attaching the patch to this ema=
il.  If
> I don=E2=80=99t hear any further feedback, I=E2=80=99ll commit it to mast=
er in a few
> days.

I'd say: commit it now, so that it really gets to a broad audience.

Anyway, would there be problems, they would be very, very limited: face
problems, that's all!

Best regards,
  Seb

--=20
Sebastien Vauban