From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Vauban Subject: Re: Config best practices? Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:07:21 +0100 Message-ID: <86pp843uly.fsf@example.com> References: <87r3sk1q56.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello Marcin, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > I'm wondering what people do to keep the configuration of their Org > files in order. I'm not sure to correctly grasp your objective. Could you restate it? > I use a dedicated top-level headline, with a COMMENT keyword, but > I started to think that a :noexport: tag might be a better idea. > > Are there any advantages of one over the other, or other approaches > altogether? I can tell you they aren't isomorphic... The noexport tag simply says "don't export this subtree". The COMMENT keyword adds "don't run any Babel code block in there". > The reason I'm asking is that I'm tweaking my org-one-to-many utility > so that it propagates the config to all the generated files. Still not that clear to me. Maybe an ECM would clarify your request? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban