From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: How to signal end of a section or subsection
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:17:19 +0100
Message-ID: <86ob333yeo.fsf@somewhere.org>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1401141001360.33044@tbetbambyn.jubv.rqh>
	<CABUh-74ThQ-_QH0TRNbKJDW4sk=N74YdUfxCeqwHiKGts15deg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87y5299tiy.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <m2zjmnbwlg.fsf@polytechnique.org>
	<87vbxbvk9x.fsf@gmail.com> <86a9enr929.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87mwinvetw.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org

Hello Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" writes:
>
>> I thought that the standard way was the following:
>>
>> ***                                                                 :B_theorem:
>>     :PROPERTIES:
>>     :BEAMER_env: theorem
>>     :END:
>>
>> There is no largest prime number.
>>
>> *** End of theorem                                            :B_ignoreheading:
>>     :PROPERTIES:
>>     :BEAMER_env: ignoreheading
>>     :END:
>>
>> Obviously, it's much less readeable...
>
> But more powerful. For example, you can nest blocks of the same type
> with this syntax. Not with the other one.
>
>> Maybe that solution should be deprecated, then?
>
> Certainly not. See above.

OK.

Is the simpler solution valid on all types of block environments?

To enumerate them (extensively, AFAICT):

- structureenv
- alertblock
- exampleblock
- definition
- example
- proof
- beamercolorbox
- verse
- quotation
- quote

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban