From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rodrigo Lazo Subject: Re: Announcing org-contacts, a bbdb-like contact manager for Org Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:26:42 -0200 Message-ID: <86lj1nykp9.fsf@thinkpad.colorado> References: <87r5bhysp6.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <878vxovsym.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58139 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnYTQ-000124-9w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:30:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnYTF-0001fg-Cf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:30:16 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnYTF-0001ej-3I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:30:13 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnYT8-0003rF-9L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:30:06 +0100 Received: from 189.111.170.27 ([189.111.170.27]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:30:06 +0100 Received: from rlazo.paz by 189.111.170.27 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:30:06 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Julien Danjou writes: > On Thu, Feb 10 2011, Dan Davison wrote: > >> Hi Julien, >> >> I'm using it (with gnus). Looks great and seems to work very nicely so >> far. >> >> One little thing: I don't seem to be getting case-insensitive >> completion, despite having org-contacts-completion-ignore-case set to t. > > Your the second one to report that to me, but it does work for me with > Emacs 24 at least. I have the exact same issue, using a fairly recent emacs-24 checkout. Other than that, works as advertised, Great work! -- Rodrigo Lazo