From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: How to improve Org startup time? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:11:11 +0100 Message-ID: <86liba6ck0.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <867gmviujs.fsf@somewhere.org> <87txpzoagt.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86d2wndo4x.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: > Can you compare the time spent by the initialization process before and > after commit 582cca5806 ? > > It should improve things sensibly, I'd be curious to know why it does not > improve anything -- if that's the case. Before giving the results, let me tell you I've now tested as well with the laptop being "powered" or not. That does change things in a factor "1 to 3". However, still far behind Nick's results. Here the results of the jury (elapsed time of `org-agenda-to-appt'): | commit | date | time (not powered) | time (powered) | ratio | |--------+--------+--------------------+----------------+-------| | f52600 | Jan 26 | 19.27 | 5.56 | 3.5 | | 0cf717 | Jan 21 | 19.74 | 5.84 | 3.4 | #+TBLFM: $5=3D$3/$4;%.1f These are the means over a couple of tests. But the maximum variance (over that small number of tests) is only about 0.04 s -- in powered mode. That is: yes, things are better, up to 5%. But, on this example, not quite significant...=C2=A0;-( FYI, I tried the ultimately current version (f518bc8) but there is a parsing error in `org-e-odt.el' -- I guess since commit 35f944a of this morning? Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban