From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Vauban Subject: Re: comment section with latex_header Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:35:30 +0100 Message-ID: <86k2y4b1gt.fsf@example.com> References: <87d23znv5a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <55110E84.3060408@roklein.de> <87zj72n5xk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86d23y3gxi.fsf@example.com> <5512A024.5050509@roklein.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Robert Klein wrote: > On 03/24/2015 10:04 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > >> Can't we say that a COMMENT'ed subtree is like having all of its >> contents commented, line by line? IOW, nothing "accessible"? > > This would probably break a lot of babel stuff. Could you elaborate why? > If there was an option to disable exports for #+NAME:-ed stuff (i.e. > data sources for babel), e.g. somtehing like > > #+NAME: xyzzy :exports none > | munich | 13 | > | cologne | 12 | > > you could deprecate and eventually disable data sources in COMMENT-ed > section. If you *not to export* some stuff in a subtree, adding the "noexport" tag would be enough, right? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban