From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Vauban Subject: Re: Tangling takes long - profiling and calling R Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 20:21:41 +0200 Message-ID: <86d20a1kui.fsf@example.com> References: <87ioaobvl1.fsf@selenimh.access.network> <87a8vzc1u8.fsf@selenimh.access.network> <07F390A6-B112-4E02-8417-E9280B24AC94@gmail.com> <87zj3gj7qg.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9pmn5fh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <876162bjpu.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Aaron Ecay writes: >> which adds to header-args, what is missing is >> >> ,---- >> | :header-args-: noweb >> `---- >> >> which would remove the "noweb yes" from the header arguments > > This is not possible with the old syntax either, though: > > * One > :PROPERTIES: > :noweb: yes > :END: > > ** Two > :PROPERTIES: > ??????? > :END: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > ... > #+end_src > > There’s nothing you can put in the ?s at heading Two to get rid of the > noweb property inherited from One. (Unless you have something in mind > which I’m not thinking of.) Quickly, just on that particular point: what you'd put there would be the "toggle" of the property (here ":noweb: no"), but that's of course sort of limited to boolean values which have an explicit "no" (or "nil") value; so I admit I just cover this particular exemple. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban