From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Error with :wrap org in babel and 8.0-pre Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:51:54 +0200 Message-ID: <86bo9fldp1.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87li8ncqzq.fsf@gmail.com> <87li8jfysj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5cjy3du.fsf@gmail.com> <87txn7y2hb.fsf@gmail.com> <874nf7fsix.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Eric Schulte wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> John Hendy writes: >>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >>>> John Hendy writes: >>>> >>>>> #+RESULTS: >>>>> #+BEGIN_org >>>>> ... >>>>> #+END_org >>>> >>>> This is wrong. We discussed it months ago on this ML and, IIRC, Babel >>>> should produce "#+begin_src org" blocks, not "#+begin_org". Org >>>> documentation specifies it too. >>> >>> "Wrong," as in =:wrap org= behavior is currently a bug? Or "wrong" in that >>> for my given use case, I shouldn't be using =:wrap org=? >> >> Wrong as is "the current behaviour is a bug". It is expected to produce >> "#+begin_src org" blocks. Its use case is to generate dead data: > > I disagree, the current behavior is *not* a bug. From the manual. > > ,---- > | 14.8.2.23 ':wrap' > | ................. > | > | The ':wrap' header argument is used to mark the results of source block > | evaluation. The header argument can be passed a string that will be > | appended to '#+BEGIN_' and '#+END_', which will then be used to wrap the > | results. If not string is specified then the results will be wrapped in > | a '#+BEGIN/END_RESULTS' block. > `---- > > I think you're confusing ":results org" with ":wrap org". And it's even possible to use ":wrap SRC org" to get the same as ":results org"... > That said, I don't think there is ever a case when you would want to use > ":wrap org". The solution to the original question is to use ":results > drawer". Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban