From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniele Pizzolli Subject: Re: problems with INCLUDE, noweb and tangle Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:52:12 +0100 Message-ID: <868uihvy4z.fsf@me.localhost.invalid> References: <86r3w9yjkx.fsf@me.localhost.invalid> <87fvcpcgml.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86h9x5w0s6.fsf@me.localhost.invalid> <86zjaxaxpy.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XyJL9-0007Cj-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:52:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XyJKz-0003Xw-14 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:52:27 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:39352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XyJKy-0003Xp-HI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:52:16 -0500 Received: from mfilter16-d.gandi.net (mfilter16-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.144]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A73B41C079 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:52:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter16-d.gandi.net (mfilter16-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WwUFtTCCF822 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:52:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.invalid (host53-18-static.13-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it [188.13.18.53]) (Authenticated sender: me@toel.it) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0480D41C07E for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:52:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <86zjaxaxpy.fsf@example.com> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:06:49 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Sebastien, Sebastien Vauban writes: >> Thanks for the clarification. I did not noticed that before. I guess >> that there is no plan to get this working for the general case, so the >> only viable option is using one big .org file. > > Or use the Library of Babel, if the code you wanna tangle gets > eventually used in many different files? Thanks, I was not aware of this option. But it seems that the blocks are statically added to the variable org-babel-library-of-babel, so when I change the included files the changes does not propagate to the library of babel automatically. I also prefer a file based solution rather than a global one. Best, Daniele