From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: LaTeX export: problem with emphasis Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:38:56 -0400 Message-ID: <8686.1251250736@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <69e68c6e0908251642j1c24f9a9qc0c2d859045db2d6@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mg7Vg-0008Or-7h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:41:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mg7Vb-0008Of-Km for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:41:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60205 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mg7Vb-0008Oc-D6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:41:07 -0400 Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.19]:57699) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mg7Vb-0000bH-1M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:41:07 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([98.110.172.159]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KOY009ZVN8WM2H0@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:39:02 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from =?UTF-8?Q?Valentin_W=C3=BCstholz?= of "Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:42:23 +0200." <69e68c6e0908251642j1c24f9a9qc0c2d859045db2d6@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Valentin_W=C3=BCstholz?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org =?UTF-8?Q?Valentin_W=C3=BCstholz?= wrote: > Hi, > > it seems to me like revision 0ba7d3d2f961a224d077e6806b804cde4c4a7726 > broke the LaTeX export of emphasises (e.g. =foo=). > > Is anybody else having the same problem? > Yes - my standard emphasis example ,---- | | * Emphasis and monospace | | - *bold* | | - /italic/ | | - _underlined_ | | - =code= | | - ~verbatim~ | | - +strike-through+ | `---- exhibits the problem - LaTeX excerpt: \item \textbf{bold} \item \emph{italic} \item \underline{underlined} \item =code= \item \~{}verbatim\~{} \item \st{strike-through} With the indicated commit reverted, the corresponding LaTeX excerpt looks like this: \item \textbf{bold} \item \emph{italic} \item \underline{underlined} \item \texttt{code} \item \texttt{verbatim} \item \st{strike-through} HTH, Nick