From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Vauban Subject: Re: ox-latex: default packages cleaning Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:22:07 +0200 Message-ID: <867fpmlzuo.fsf@example.com> References: <87r3ok589c.fsf@gmx.us> <20150707193522.GB30985@chitra.no-ip.org> <87y4iq24kl.fsf@gmx.us> <20150708154139.GG32342@chitra.no-ip.org> <878uaq33bj.fsf@gmx.us> <20150716082958.GP18343@chitra.no-ip.org> <87y4igxza3.fsf@gmx.us> <86si8am2lq.fsf@example.com> <87egjuxarx.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Rasmus writes: > Sebastien Vauban writes: > >> FWIW, it seems that people who played with different LaTeX engines used >> the "LATEX_CMD" property, as adviced on Worg [1]. Doesn't matter if we >> change that, but just a reminder of some already common usage. > > I didn't know that worg page. Just to understand, you are advising to > use "LATEX_CMD" as the keyword name? Yes. > FWIW, that's fine with me, though presently it's not really accurate > as only {pdf,xe,lua}latex is allowed AFAIK, it's not intended to do more than just indicating which flavor of the LaTeX engine to use (and, then, correctly update the real commands which will be run), that is {pdf,xe,lua}latex. > (I'm hesitant to allow arbitrary scripts). I agree. Just stick to the basic need, which is to be able to easily change of LaTeX engine. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban