From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: [OT] mail followup to (was Re: M-x fill-region equivalent for lists?) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:18:51 +0200 Message-ID: <8661tvhhb8.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87a9ja4hio.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87li2svpdk.fsf_-_@ucl.ac.uk> <8761twpr3o.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Eric, Eric S Fraga wrote: > John Hendy writes: > >> Got it. And now that you say that, *that's* what puzzled me when sending it >> out: I got an email back to myself. So *that* I still do find weird. If I >> send an email in response to your email on the list, why would I want it >> sent directly to myself? Is that just because if someone then responds to >> *that* email, it ensures that I get a direct email as well as the one to >> the list? > > Yes, and it does seem to have the annoying side effect that if *you* reply, > you might also get a copy. This wouldn't happen to me as I think that gnus > filters out any "me" addresses in doing a followup. Yes, you must have something along that line: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;; addresses to prune (disable `Cc:' to myself) when doing wide replies (setq message-dont-reply-to-names gnus-ignored-from-addresses) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- in your .gnus. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban