From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Guest Subject: Re: v3, with support for narrowing Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:42:08 +1200 Message-ID: <8639l020r3.wl%simon.guest@tesujimath.org> References: <867hal4a6t.wl%simon.guest@tesujimath.org> <87iptzoa5x.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <86zknb9v1y.wl%simon.guest@tesujimath.org> <87oc3qg4f8.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <86y62uxc90.wl%simon.guest@tesujimath.org> <86y62tyg2u.wl%simon.guest@tesujimath.org> <871v0leq3h.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <17141.1304048141@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87k4edd6fw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <3543.1304089011@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFvS2-0000aH-2L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:42:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFvS1-0008Rn-3S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:42:14 -0400 Received: from snapmx1.ironport.snap.net.nz ([202.37.100.100]:60169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFvS0-0008Qs-PS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:42:13 -0400 Received: from aji.tesujimath.org (233.253.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz [111.69.253.233]) by rupert.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F641FD54 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:42:09 +1200 (NZST) Received: from sabaki.local ([10.0.1.242] helo=sabaki.tesujimath.org.tesujimath.org) by aji.tesujimath.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QFvRx-0008Dm-CZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:42:09 +1200 In-Reply-To: <3543.1304089011@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:56:51 -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > Indeed: it would require a bit of refactoring of Simon's code to provide the > function(s) to apply to each entry, and changes to the top level functions to > use the mapping API instead of looping explicitly. That sounds like a good idea. I may at some stage want to exclude counting certain trees, and then I may have another look at this if someone else hasn't already done it. But for now, time pressure dictates I stop hacking on my word count function. cheers, Simon