From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard)
Subject: Re: Problem with dates while generating HTML
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:42:08 -0400
Message-ID: <86398bidbj.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
References: <87obsbrpu9.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <871unv4h6l.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34507)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SHgxC-00081t-Ur
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:42:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SHgx8-0005hb-I6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:42:14 -0400
Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:54732
	helo=mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SHgx8-0005hP-Cl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:42:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871unv4h6l.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012
	19:42:26 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Fran=C3=A7ois,

Bonjour, Bastien!

>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
>> it a limitation (or a bug)?

> I would call it a limitation.

Could it be documented somewhere appropriate?  Along with Nick's
suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem.

Fran=C3=A7ois