From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Pinard?= <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 12:52:26 -0400
Message-ID: <861umw3pdh.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca>
References: <8662c9rqtq.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca>
	<87397dgg9a.fsf@gmail.com> <86wr4orffa.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca>
	<87y5p44gbi.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51347)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SRRAk-0000A6-J6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 12:52:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SRRAi-0006P9-Ud
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 12:52:30 -0400
Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:56874
	helo=mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1SRRAi-0006P2-Oa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 12:52:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87y5p44gbi.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 07
	May 2012 09:10:25 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> This is correct. I was just pointing out (though, admittedly, not very
> clearly) that the final part of the next sentence in the manual,
> "sometimes it is convenient to put them into a comment line", isn't.

It might be worth making the manual clear, so users know what's
happening, and what is worth pursuing and avoiding.

> At the moment, "<<tag>>" and "# <<tag>>" produce, respectively, "<a
> name=3D"tag" id=3D"tag">tag</a>" and "<a name=3D"tag" id=3D"tag"></a>".

> In a not so distant future "<<tag>>" will produce "<a name=3D"tag"
> id=3D"tag"></a>" and "# <<tag>>" will be ignored.

And one will be able to use <<tag>> anywhere, would it be at the
beginning of a header of sentence.  That would solve all my problems!
So I'm eagerly awaiting for that "a not so distant future" to turn into
"a recent past" :-).  Thanks for the clarification.

> I hope this is clearer now.

In this message, yes.  In the manual, not yet!

Fran=C3=A7ois