From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: [ANN] Edit emails in Org-mode Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:24:09 +0200 Message-ID: <861u7w6i5i.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <8738sedkk4.fsf@gmail.com> <86ip19dzwh.fsf@somewhere.org> <8761x90z4o.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org HI Thorsten, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >> Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >>> 2.3 Usage >>> ~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> There are only two commands involved: >>> >>> Command Keybinding Comment >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> M-x outorg-edit-as-org M-# M-# or M-# # outline-prefix M-# >>> C-c ' outline-prefix C-c >>> M-x outorg-copy-edits-and-exit M-# --- >> >> When I have "message" code blocks, and when I edit them in an indirect buffer >> (for refilling them, for example), then I have a draft message that stays in >> my Gnus/Message emails. >> >> Any idea how to get rid of that? > > its a nice idea to be able to replace the source-blocks by their results > when composing messages (if I understood your feature request right). No, this may be a good idea, but not what I was talking about. I now have the following capture command: #+begin_src emacs-lisp (add-to-list 'org-capture-templates `("m" "Mail to task" entry (file+headline ,org-default-notes-file "Tasks") "* TODO %:subject%? (from %:fromname) :mail: %:date-timestamp-inactive #+begin_src message %i #+end_src >From %a" :immediate-finish t) t) #+end_src But, sometimes, I want to refill the contents of the captured email. To do so, I go onto the email message code block, edit it in an indirect buffer (through C-c '), refill, and quit the indirect buffer (another C-c '). Though, after having done that, I now have the above email saved as a draft in Gnus. Not what I was expecting. So, my question was: how to avoid the email to be saved as a draft? > Opens a lot of possiblilities for (semi-)automatic email creation. > > Here is the doc-string: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > (defun outorg-replace-source-blocks-with-results > (&optional arg &rest languages) > "Replace source-blocks with their results. > > Only source-blocks with ':export results' in their header > arguments will be mapped. > > If LANGUAGES is non-nil, only those source-blocks with a > language found in the list are mapped. > > If LANGUAGES is nil but a prefix-argument ARG is given, only the > languages read from the mini-buffer (separated by blanks) are mapped. > > Otherwise, all languages found in `org-babel-load-languages' are mapped." ...) > #+end_src > > it basically says: > > - only blocks with ':export results' will be mapped > > - blocks for all languages found in `org-babel-load-languages' will be mapped, > except the function ist called (from a program) with a list of language > names (as strings) or the user calls the command with prefix arg (e.g. C-u) > and enters language names (like this: R emacs-lisp sh org). > > let me know if the function does what you wanted. > > Do we need a keybinding for that, or should it rather be a bit oscure (only > accessible by M-x) to avoid confusing accidents? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban