* BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
@ 2013-11-07 17:51 Sebastien Vauban
2013-11-07 20:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sebastien Vauban @ 2013-11-07 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Hello,
In the `org-latex-classes' documentation (and in the Org Beamer documentation),
I don't see how to include or exclude lines passed through the #+BEAMER_HEADER
keyword.
╭────
│ The header string
│ -----------------
│
│ The HEADER-STRING is the header that will be inserted into the
│ LaTeX file. It should contain the \documentclass macro, and
│ anything else that is needed for this setup. To this header, the
│ following commands will be added:
│
│ - Calls to \usepackage for all packages mentioned in the
│ variables `org-latex-default-packages-alist' and
│ `org-latex-packages-alist'. Thus, your header definitions
│ should avoid to also request these packages.
│
│ - Lines specified via "#+LATEX_HEADER:" and
│ "#+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA:" keywords.
│
│ If you need more control about the sequence in which the header
│ is built up, or if you want to exclude one of these building
│ blocks for a particular class, you can use the following
│ macro-like placeholders.
│
│ [DEFAULT-PACKAGES] \usepackage statements for default packages
│ [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES] do not include any of the default packages
│ [PACKAGES] \usepackage statements for packages
│ [NO-PACKAGES] do not include the packages
│ [EXTRA] the stuff from #+LATEX_HEADER(_EXTRA)
│ [NO-EXTRA] do not include #+LATEX_HEADER(_EXTRA) stuff
╰────
Is there a solution for those lines?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
2013-11-07 17:51 BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes' Sebastien Vauban
@ 2013-11-07 20:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-08 9:40 ` Sebastien Vauban
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2013-11-07 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastien Vauban; +Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Hello,
"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
writes:
> In the `org-latex-classes' documentation (and in the Org Beamer documentation),
> I don't see how to include or exclude lines passed through the #+BEAMER_HEADER
> keyword.
[...]
> Is there a solution for those lines?
These lines are included in [EXTRA] placeholder, like LATEX_HEADER.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
2013-11-07 20:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2013-11-08 9:40 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-11-08 10:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sebastien Vauban @ 2013-11-08 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> In the `org-latex-classes' documentation (and in the Org Beamer documentation),
>> I don't see how to include or exclude lines passed through the #+BEAMER_HEADER
>> keyword.
>>
>> Is there a solution for those lines?
>
> These lines are included in [EXTRA] placeholder, like LATEX_HEADER.
True. Confirmed ;-)
I'd then propose the attached patch for the documentation.
BTW, what's the difference between #+LATEX_HEADER and #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA
lines, if both end up under the same umbrella ([EXTRA])? Couldn't we suppress
the #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA keyword?
Best regards,
Seb
From 6b6e9c06e1933820a0f0a1837dc1ea3e8a090c55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:27:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add #+BEAMER_HEADER keyword line in [EXTRA]
* ox-latex.el (org-latex-classes): Add BEAMER_HEADER in the documentation string.
---
lisp/ox-latex.el | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/ox-latex.el b/lisp/ox-latex.el
index ae78260..cf53c38 100644
--- a/lisp/ox-latex.el
+++ b/lisp/ox-latex.el
@@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ macro-like placeholders.
[NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES] do not include any of the default packages
[PACKAGES] \\usepackage statements for packages
[NO-PACKAGES] do not include the packages
- [EXTRA] the stuff from #+LATEX_HEADER(_EXTRA)
- [NO-EXTRA] do not include #+LATEX_HEADER(_EXTRA) stuff
+ [EXTRA] the stuff from #+LATEX/BEAMER_HEADER(_EXTRA)
+ [NO-EXTRA] do not include #+LATEX/BEAMER_HEADER(_EXTRA) stuff
So a header like
--
1.7.9
--
Sebastien Vauban
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
2013-11-08 9:40 ` Sebastien Vauban
@ 2013-11-08 10:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-08 10:27 ` Sebastien Vauban
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2013-11-08 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastien Vauban; +Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Hello,
"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
writes:
> I'd then propose the attached patch for the documentation.
Thank you for the patch.
> BTW, what's the difference between #+LATEX_HEADER and #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA
> lines, if both end up under the same umbrella ([EXTRA])? Couldn't we suppress
> the #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA keyword?
According to section 12.7.2 in manual, LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA will not be
loaded when previewing LaTeX snippets, unlike to LATEX_HEADER.
> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-classes): Add BEAMER_HEADER in the
> documentation string.
`beamer' is a different back-end than `latex', or to put it differently,
`latex' back-end is not supposed to know about `beamer'. That's why no
reference to `beamer' appears in `org-latex-classes'.
If documentation is needed, I think it should go in the manual, as
a footnote close to the reference to BEAMER_HEADER.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
2013-11-08 10:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2013-11-08 10:27 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-11-08 10:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sebastien Vauban @ 2013-11-08 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> I'd then propose the attached patch for the documentation.
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
>> BTW, what's the difference between #+LATEX_HEADER and #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA
>> lines, if both end up under the same umbrella ([EXTRA])? Couldn't we suppress
>> the #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA keyword?
>
> According to section 12.7.2 in manual, LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA will not be
> loaded when previewing LaTeX snippets, unlike to LATEX_HEADER.
Shouldn't the similar principle be applied to BEAMER_HEADER, that is have a
BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA keyword as well?
>> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-classes): Add BEAMER_HEADER in the
>> documentation string.
>
> `beamer' is a different back-end than `latex', or to put it differently,
> `latex' back-end is not supposed to know about `beamer'.
I understand.
> That's why no reference to `beamer' appears in `org-latex-classes'.
Though, this is only true as long as ox-beamer is not loaded. Because ox-beamer
does add "beamer" to `org-latex-classes' (which is right IMO).
> If documentation is needed, I think it should go in the manual, as
> a footnote close to the reference to BEAMER_HEADER.
OK.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
2013-11-08 10:27 ` Sebastien Vauban
@ 2013-11-08 10:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-08 11:19 ` Sebastien Vauban
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2013-11-08 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastien Vauban; +Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
writes:
> Shouldn't the similar principle be applied to BEAMER_HEADER, that is have a
> BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA keyword as well?
Snippets previewing calls `latex' back-end (class used in
`org-format-latex-header' is "article", not "beamer).
Therefore #+BEAMER_HEADER will not be applied to the generated document
and BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA doesn't make much sense.
>> That's why no reference to `beamer' appears in `org-latex-classes'.
>
> Though, this is only true as long as ox-beamer is not loaded. Because ox-beamer
> does add "beamer" to `org-latex-classes' (which is right IMO).
I meant that no reference appears in `org-latex-classes' docstring.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
2013-11-08 10:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2013-11-08 11:19 ` Sebastien Vauban
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sebastien Vauban @ 2013-11-08 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" writes:
>
>> Shouldn't the similar principle be applied to BEAMER_HEADER, that is have a
>> BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA keyword as well?
>
> Snippets previewing calls `latex' back-end (class used in
> `org-format-latex-header' is "article", not "beamer).
> Therefore #+BEAMER_HEADER will not be applied to the generated document
> and BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA doesn't make much sense.
Understood, now...
>>> That's why no reference to `beamer' appears in `org-latex-classes'.
>>
>> Though, this is only true as long as ox-beamer is not loaded. Because ox-beamer
>> does add "beamer" to `org-latex-classes' (which is right IMO).
>
> I meant that no reference appears in `org-latex-classes' docstring.
Clear. Thanks.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-08 11:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-07 17:51 BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes' Sebastien Vauban
2013-11-07 20:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-08 9:40 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-11-08 10:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-08 10:27 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-11-08 10:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-11-08 11:19 ` Sebastien Vauban
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).