From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Restore previous folded state of org buffer Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:38:16 +0200 Message-ID: <852D1E7E-03D9-4DB5-8CAE-45FD23B551C6@gmail.com> References: <87hbx0zibp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vdlge6t2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <5F021407-8552-48CD-9B5B-875C5F64B56B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXqFh-0002Hn-P9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:38:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXqFc-0002G7-7W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:38:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37463 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MXqFc-0002Fz-3D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:38:24 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:15465) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MXqFb-0005sI-PY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:38:23 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.146]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MXqFa-0004fU-Mx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:38:22 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so857849eyb.24 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:38:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: User Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Aug 3, 2009, at 7:33 AM, User wrote: > Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes: >> >> this is great functionality, thanks for sharing it. I would like >> to include it with Org-mode, s I need to ask: Do you have a >> copyright assignment with the FSF? Or are you willing to sign one? > > I don't have one and I doubt I'll have the time in these days to > deal with it. Getting one takes about 5 minutes now, and 5 minutes in a few weeks. > > The code is pretty trivial and short, so I think the best course > of action is that someone with proper legal status reimplements > it for org. That is also a possibility, ok. - Carsten