From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: Losing trust in Org: stable org-mode releases and unit tests for basic functionality Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:00:35 +0100 Message-ID: <84twma7xl8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <55CA2E6B.4060102@gmail.com> <2016-01-17T10-45-36@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8460ysjpc0.fsf@gmail.com> <2016-01-18T14-47-47@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51275) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLS9m-0001vy-Kw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 04:00:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLS9g-0007jk-VY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 04:00:54 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLS9g-0007jb-Oa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 04:00:48 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aLS9e-000632-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:00:46 +0100 Received: from hsi-kbw-085-216-069-216.hsi.kabelbw.de ([85.216.69.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:00:46 +0100 Received: from marcowahlsoft by hsi-kbw-085-216-069-216.hsi.kabelbw.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:00:46 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Karl, > * Marco Wahl wrote: >> >> Further I think you can improve Org's reliability (and your perception >> on it) by investing more energy into Org. Obviously you already do >> invest energy into Org as your contributions on this list show. You >> cold go ahead and start reading Org's code, writing tests, etc. Each >> action would give you more confidence with Org. > > I can follow your thoughts here. > Unfortunately, my elisp knowledge is still to basic to think of > writing ERT tests for my typical use-cases and add them to > org-mode/testing/list/* :-( Hopefully you will find time to dig into elisp! > I was not able to even locate a simple "mark a simple recurring todo > as done"-test in the current testset. Is it true, that there is no > such test so far? I also could not find such test. This means potential for more tests. Best wishes, -- Marco Wahl GPG: 0x49010A040A3AE6F2