From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrea Rossetti <andrea.rossetti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Table formula with @I
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:17:56 +0200
Message-ID: <84sikb2wuz.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87tx4rbcyn.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56783)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andrea.rossetti@gmail.com>) id 1XOTMq-0000en-3S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 11:18:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andrea.rossetti@gmail.com>) id 1XOTMj-0003db-PA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 11:18:04 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:58129)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andrea.rossetti@gmail.com>) id 1XOTMj-0003bs-J0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 11:17:57 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id bs8so12824334wib.9
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87tx4rbcyn.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> (Loris Bennett's
	message of "Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:02:56 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Loris Bennett <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> writes:
> In the following:
>
> |   |   |   |
> |   |   |   |
> |---+---+---|
> | 1 | 1 | 1 |
> #+TBLFM: @I$3=1
>
> I expected to get a '1' just in the third column.  Where am I going
> wrong?

(apologies in advance for suggesting just a workaround
instead of a rational explanation, hope it helps anyway)

It happened to me too some time ago, I used a slightly
different formula and it worked:

#+TBLFM: @I+1$3..@I+1$3=1

Does it work for you too? Kindest regards,

  Andrea